In ethics[ edit ] In ethics when discussing behavior and moralityan individual is said to possess the virtue of integrity if the individual's actions are based upon an internally consistent framework of principles.
Of the great variety of kinds of argumentation used in the law, some are persuasive rather than strictly logical, and others exemplify different procedures in applied logic rather than the formulas of pure logic.
From that point onward, a more or less continuous history of such reflection can be traced up to the present day. As is true with the history of philosophy more generally, one can observe over the centuries changes not only in the theories set forth but also in the central questions about law that such theories were meant to answer.
Although every philosophical theory is in part a product of the time, place, and culture in which it is developed, the philosophy of law is parochial in an additional sense. Philosophical speculation about the nature of law not only is very often shaped by the politics of the time and place of a given theorist but is also carried on with a specific sort of legal system and legal culture in view.
The latter fact is important, as the kinds of legal systems in Europe and the Anglophone world have varied widely through the last several millennia.
Although the shape and structure of those systems cannot be discussed in any detail here, it should nonetheless be noted that a robust understanding One right answer thesis dworkin each of the major theories and texts in the history of philosophy of law requires some acquaintance with the legal systems of the cities and states in which a given theory was developed.
As a result, Aristotle theorized about law primarily on the model of general rules of action enacted by legislation and revisable by direct vote or other plebiscitary means. To take a different example, starting in the 17th century many British and later other Anglophone philosophers of law argued for the central importance of judicial institutions for the very existence of a legal system and debated the idea of legal reasoning as a distinct sort of deliberative activity.
More recently, increasing attention has been paid to the related question of how the language of the law is to be correctly interpreted.
Some theorists, beginning in the early 20th century, even found it fruitful to think about the nature of law primarily from the point of view of legal professionals such as judges or lawyers.
That development is surely to be at least partly explained by the fact that those theorists reflected on law almost exclusively within advanced common law systems—i.
Ancient Greece The abstract concept of law is acknowledged, though not discussed, in the poems of Homer and Hesiod in the 8th—7th century bce.
In the Greek histories and literature of the 6th and 5th centuries bce, however, one finds the first articulation of ideas about law that have had enduring influence in the West: They do whatever it bids.
The great dramatist Sophoclesin his tragedy Antigone, first made salient the important idea that the requirements of law and morality may conflict.
Out of familial duty, Antigone flouts the order and buries the body, thereby herself risking punishment by death. The relevant Greek term, nomos, varied widely in meaning across contextsoften referring simply to convention or practice.
In his dialogue Crito, Plato fictionally cast his teacher, Socratesimprisoned and sentenced to death for impiety and corrupting the youngas faced with a choice between accepting the death penalty and escaping, thereby disobeying the law.
In the dialogue Socrates makes the provocative argument, on behalf of the laws of Athens, that since he has received the benefits and protections of living under law for his entire life and has never left the city out of protest, he is obligated either to obey its laws or to persuade the state that they should not be enforced against him.
Since he has failed at his trial in the latter task, he must respect the laws by obeying their commands, regardless of their content. Because of its universal nature, a law can sometimes fail to apply, or apply only indeterminately, to a novel case unforeseen by the legislator.
Detail of a Roman copy 2nd century bce of a Greek alabaster portrait bust of Aristotle, c. He shared the common Greek view that, as a general principle, law had a share in eternal divine wisdom. As such, it was an instrument by which to constrain the exercise of political power, particularly that of tyrants, whose policies represented only their own interests and not the good of the community.
The Romans established new legal forms and institutions as well as the first legal professionals and administrators. This practice culminated in the Digest Digestaassembled by the Byzantine emperor Justinian I reigned — cea work that eventually served as the basis of many modern legal systems of western Europe.
But whereas Greek law faded in influence, the Greek legacy in the philosophy of law was to endure for several centuries, extending through the Middle Agesduring which there were many refinements and extensions of Greek themes and ideas, particularly within the Christian tradition.
In his work De republica On the Republiche famously held, echoing Sophocles, that: This more-capacious conception of law set rather strict moral conditions that putative positive human-created law must meet in order to qualify as real law: Natural-law theory was given its first systematic treatment by the great Christian philosopher St.
He claimed, in terms clearer than in previous theories, that law had by nature a distinctive point or purpose. In the most-abstract sense, the purpose of law is to serve the common good of a political community.
More concretely, law is a promulgated plan of coordination whereby a society can realize goods both tangible and intangible that cannot be achieved by other means. Painting of Thomas Aquinas; attributed to Botticelli, — This derivation can occur in two ways.
First, law can be derived by a kind of immediate deduction from moral principles, such that there is a direct correspondence in content between a moral and a legal rule. For example, from the moral principle that murder is wrong, the legal prohibition of homicide may be formulated and enacted.At one time, capitalism appeared horrifying because it produced misery; later, it turned out to be horrifying because it produces such abundance that it kills culture.
Feb 24, · In summary, Dworkin’s right thesis asserts that a right legal answer would be one that asserts and protect rights which are explicit or implicit in the fundamental values of the legal system. To get the right answer, judges must have the ultimate wisdom from the history of decisions and the understanding of the political value of a system.
Course Sequence Guide for B.A.
Degree in Geography and Environmental Sustainability. This course sequence guide is designed to assist students in completing their UTSA undergraduate Geography and Environmental Sustainability degree requirements. My father was a high-ranking student radical poobah and still thinks Castro was the bees' knees.
Although I'm technically a red diaper baby, I've rejected all that baloney. Ronald Dworkin's earlier work advocated that there exists a unique right answer for a vast majority of cases. However the nature of this ‘right answer thesis’ was a direct response to Hart's argument on ‘open texture’ and judicial discretion.
The following text is the introductory article to “my” anthology Dissecting the Holocaust. I wrote the original German version of this paper in the summer of for the German edition of this book (Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte).The text was updated and slightly enhanced for the first English edition in , and again for the second English edition in , from which the following text.