An essay on the right of people to bear arms

Essay on Right to Bear Arms Essay on Right to Bear Arms The right to bear arms is one of the things that make our nation such a great and peaceful nation.

An essay on the right of people to bear arms

InSunnyvale, California, banned high-capacity magazines. An appeals court agreed and the Supreme Court refused to consider the issue further. While they are subject to minimal federal regulation and already banned in 10 states, they are easily obtained and big sellers.

There is no reason anyone outside of law enforcement or the military needs one except to kill people without attracting attention.

Beyond accessories, other changes in gun laws are needed to accomplish what everyone in the debate agrees is a laudable goal: Keep firearms out of the hands of bad guys.

Unfortunately, the NRA has been working for years to make sure lunatics and felons can obtain guns as easily as possible. When introduced, the legislation called on states to submit mental-health records to national databases maintained by the FBI.

The NRA declared this violated the Second Amendment and, through intense lobbying, limited the definition of mental illness only to people institutionalized or found by a court to be a danger.

Over exhibitors from some the most important firearm companies came to the show which drew thousands of gun consumers. In the past, because of concerns that an unbalanced person could relapse after treatment, the rules provided that anyone prohibited from having a gun for psychological reasons was banned forever.

Now a person committed to a mental hospital can, after getting out, petition a court for his guns. And by lobbying state legislatures, the NRA made sure psychiatric experts play a puny role in determining if a former mental patient should have a gun.

Instead, in places like Idaho, state judges who are ill-equipped to make such a determination do it with no input from experts. According to the NRA, every armed madman or criminal is a responsible, law-abiding good guy with a gun until the moment his first bullet splatters the walls with the brains and blood of innocent people.

So ignore the extremists. The only way to keep guns out of the hands of bad guys is to figure out who they are before they get armed.

That means universal background checks and record-keeping requirements for all firearms transactions. Under federal law, purchases from a licensed gun dealer require identification, and a form stating the buyer is purchasing it for himself and is not part of a group prohibited from obtaining a gun—felons, people under felony indictment, drug addicts, fugitives and the like.

Then, after a background check 90 percent of them take a few minutesthe sale is complete. The dealer makes a record of the transaction and keeps it permanently.

This is wonderful for a criminal—or a psychopath. Private parties are allowed to sell at gun shows—and anywhere else. Polls show overwhelming support for checks—as much as 92 percent in a Quinnipiac University poll from last year, including 86 percent of Republicans.

An essay on the right of people to bear arms

But first the background check process has to be tightened up across the board, as was made obvious in the case of Dylann Roof, the man arrested for the recent shooting spree in an African Methodist Episcopal church in Charleston, South Carolina.

He was charged in February with possession of a prescription narcotic, which would have prohibited a dealer from selling him a firearm.

Under the rules, the government had three days to check out Roof. Because of a mix-up, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was still trying to obtain his arrest record after the three days passed. So Roof returned after the three days and, with no completed background check, bought his gun. The last compromise gun advocates should make is based on the words of that conservative hero, Ronald Reagan: Armed members of the Black Panthers Party stand in the corridor of the capitol in Sacramento, May 2, They were protesting a Ronald Reagan championed bill before an Assembly committee that would restrict the carrying of arms in public.

Or the buffoon with an AR loaded with a round drum who last month walked around an Atlanta airport. Or the nitwit in Gulfport, Mississippi, who menaced shoppers at a Wal-Mart by loading and racking shells into a shotgun a few weeks ago, forcing an evacuation of the store.

In all of these states, that near-sociopathic behavior was legal. But how can anyone tell whether these nincompoops parading around with their guns on display are merely acting like a 4-year-old proudly showing everyone his penis or constitute a deadly menace?

Ask someone at the posh Omni Austin Hotel in Texas; earlier this month, a man walked around the lobby with a rifle, legally scaring people. Then he shot and killed someone. In this great compromise, that is all the gun controllers get: That brings us to what gun enthusiasts should receive in the bargain.

First, anyone who wants to obtain a license to carry a concealed weapon should be given one. A criminal or disturbed person will carry a concealed weapon, licensed or not. Then there are the gun accessories that have spooky names, but are mostly designed to protect the shooter.

For example, flash suppressors have been outlawed on the belief they will be used to minimize the chance of spotting a shooter.- The origin of the right to keep and bear arms all started with the culture of having guns, then events that brought fear among people, then valid arguments for the need of arms.

This explains the historical origin of the second . Citizens have the right to bear arms. It just all depends how they take action.

According to a report by engineering statistician the general public is 5. 7 times more likely to be arrested for violent offenses and 5 times more likely to be arrested for non-violent offenses, than concealed carry weapon permit holders.

Federalist No.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

46 is an essay by James Madison, the forty-sixth of The Federalist Papers. It was published on January 29, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. Essay on Right to Bear Arms.

In conclusion I am for the right to bear arms if it is going to make myself and family and mainly the people that I care for safe and secure then I say if you don't like it dont't have one then, but maybe someday you will be thank full for the rights that you have as an Anerican of the united states of america.

The Right to Bear Arms "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." These are the words of the second amendment as written by our forefathers/5(2).

“Without the right to bear arms, we would have anarchy in the streets, the criminals would still have guns, and violent crime would escalate,” the opponents of gun control say (Killias, ). In Australia, it is testified, public safety has essentially decreased after intensified gun control.

Hot Essays: Essay on Right to Bear Arms